| Metamath Proof Explorer |
< Previous
Next >
Related theorems Unicode version |
| Description: Part of a study related to ax-12 965. The second antecedent of ax-12 965 is replaced. There are no distinct variable restrictions. |
| Ref | Expression |
|---|---|
| a12stdy4 |
|
| Step | Hyp | Ref | Expression |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | ax-10o 1136 |
. . . . . . 7
| |
| 2 | 1 | alequcoms 1139 |
. . . . . 6
|
| 3 | 2 | con3d 95 |
. . . . 5
|
| 4 | 3 | impcom 351 |
. . . 4
|
| 5 | 4 | pm2.21d 78 |
. . 3
|
| 6 | 5 | ex 373 |
. 2
|
| 7 | ax-12 965 |
. . 3
| |
| 8 | 7 | a1dd 42 |
. 2
|
| 9 | 6, 8 | pm2.61d 127 |
1
|
| Colors of variables: wff set class |
| Syntax hints: |
| This theorem was proved from axioms: ax-1 4 ax-2 5 ax-3 6 ax-mp 7 ax-10 963 ax-12 965 ax-10o 1136 |
| This theorem depends on definitions: df-bi 147 df-an 225 |