HomeHome Metamath Proof Explorer < Previous   Next >
Related theorems
Unicode version

Axiom ax-9o 1792
Description: A variant of ax-9 1624. Axiom scheme C10' in [Megill] p. 448 (p. 16 of the preprint).

This axiom is redundant, as shown by theorem ax9o 1791.

Assertion
Ref Expression
ax-9o |- (A.x(x = y -> A.xph) -> ph)

Detailed syntax breakdown of Axiom ax-9o
StepHypRef Expression
1 vx . . . . . 6 set x
21cv 1614 . . . . 5 class x
3 vy . . . . . 6 set y
43cv 1614 . . . . 5 class y
52, 4wceq 1615 . . . 4 wff x = y
6 wph . . . . 5 wff ph
76, 1wal 1613 . . . 4 wff A.xph
85, 7wi 3 . . 3 wff (x = y -> A.xph)
98, 1wal 1613 . 2 wff A.x(x = y -> A.xph)
109, 6wi 3 1 wff (A.x(x = y -> A.xph) -> ph)
Colors of variables: wff set class
This axiom is referenced by:  ax9 1793  equid 1795  equs4 1820  equsal 1821  a4imt 1829  a4im 1830  cbv1 1833
Copyright terms: Public domain