MPE Home Metamath Proof Explorer < Previous   Next >
Nearby theorems
Mirrors  >  Home  >  MPE Home  >  Th. List  >  cbvoprab2 Structured version   Unicode version

Theorem cbvoprab2 6137
Description: Change the second bound variable in an operation abstraction. (Contributed by Jeff Madsen, 11-Jun-2010.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 11-Dec-2016.)
Hypotheses
Ref Expression
cbvoprab2.1  |-  F/ w ph
cbvoprab2.2  |-  F/ y ps
cbvoprab2.3  |-  ( y  =  w  ->  ( ph 
<->  ps ) )
Assertion
Ref Expression
cbvoprab2  |-  { <. <.
x ,  y >. ,  z >.  |  ph }  =  { <. <. x ,  w >. ,  z >.  |  ps }
Distinct variable group:    x, w, y, z
Allowed substitution hints:    ph( x, y, z, w)    ps( x, y, z, w)

Proof of Theorem cbvoprab2
Dummy variable  v is distinct from all other variables.
StepHypRef Expression
1 nfv 1629 . . . . . . 7  |-  F/ w  v  =  <. <. x ,  y >. ,  z
>.
2 cbvoprab2.1 . . . . . . 7  |-  F/ w ph
31, 2nfan 1846 . . . . . 6  |-  F/ w
( v  =  <. <.
x ,  y >. ,  z >.  /\  ph )
43nfex 1865 . . . . 5  |-  F/ w E. z ( v  = 
<. <. x ,  y
>. ,  z >.  /\ 
ph )
5 nfv 1629 . . . . . . 7  |-  F/ y  v  =  <. <. x ,  w >. ,  z >.
6 cbvoprab2.2 . . . . . . 7  |-  F/ y ps
75, 6nfan 1846 . . . . . 6  |-  F/ y ( v  =  <. <.
x ,  w >. ,  z >.  /\  ps )
87nfex 1865 . . . . 5  |-  F/ y E. z ( v  =  <. <. x ,  w >. ,  z >.  /\  ps )
9 opeq2 3977 . . . . . . . . 9  |-  ( y  =  w  ->  <. x ,  y >.  =  <. x ,  w >. )
109opeq1d 3982 . . . . . . . 8  |-  ( y  =  w  ->  <. <. x ,  y >. ,  z
>.  =  <. <. x ,  w >. ,  z >.
)
1110eqeq2d 2446 . . . . . . 7  |-  ( y  =  w  ->  (
v  =  <. <. x ,  y >. ,  z
>. 
<->  v  =  <. <. x ,  w >. ,  z >.
) )
12 cbvoprab2.3 . . . . . . 7  |-  ( y  =  w  ->  ( ph 
<->  ps ) )
1311, 12anbi12d 692 . . . . . 6  |-  ( y  =  w  ->  (
( v  =  <. <.
x ,  y >. ,  z >.  /\  ph ) 
<->  ( v  =  <. <.
x ,  w >. ,  z >.  /\  ps )
) )
1413exbidv 1636 . . . . 5  |-  ( y  =  w  ->  ( E. z ( v  = 
<. <. x ,  y
>. ,  z >.  /\ 
ph )  <->  E. z
( v  =  <. <.
x ,  w >. ,  z >.  /\  ps )
) )
154, 8, 14cbvex 1983 . . . 4  |-  ( E. y E. z ( v  =  <. <. x ,  y >. ,  z
>.  /\  ph )  <->  E. w E. z ( v  = 
<. <. x ,  w >. ,  z >.  /\  ps ) )
1615exbii 1592 . . 3  |-  ( E. x E. y E. z ( v  = 
<. <. x ,  y
>. ,  z >.  /\ 
ph )  <->  E. x E. w E. z ( v  =  <. <. x ,  w >. ,  z >.  /\  ps ) )
1716abbii 2547 . 2  |-  { v  |  E. x E. y E. z ( v  =  <. <. x ,  y
>. ,  z >.  /\ 
ph ) }  =  { v  |  E. x E. w E. z
( v  =  <. <.
x ,  w >. ,  z >.  /\  ps ) }
18 df-oprab 6077 . 2  |-  { <. <.
x ,  y >. ,  z >.  |  ph }  =  { v  |  E. x E. y E. z ( v  = 
<. <. x ,  y
>. ,  z >.  /\ 
ph ) }
19 df-oprab 6077 . 2  |-  { <. <.
x ,  w >. ,  z >.  |  ps }  =  { v  |  E. x E. w E. z ( v  = 
<. <. x ,  w >. ,  z >.  /\  ps ) }
2017, 18, 193eqtr4i 2465 1  |-  { <. <.
x ,  y >. ,  z >.  |  ph }  =  { <. <. x ,  w >. ,  z >.  |  ps }
Colors of variables: wff set class
Syntax hints:    -> wi 4    <-> wb 177    /\ wa 359   E.wex 1550   F/wnf 1553    = wceq 1652   {cab 2421   <.cop 3809   {coprab 6074
This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-1 5  ax-2 6  ax-3 7  ax-mp 8  ax-gen 1555  ax-5 1566  ax-17 1626  ax-9 1666  ax-8 1687  ax-6 1744  ax-7 1749  ax-11 1761  ax-12 1950  ax-ext 2416
This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 178  df-or 360  df-an 361  df-3an 938  df-tru 1328  df-ex 1551  df-nf 1554  df-sb 1659  df-clab 2422  df-cleq 2428  df-clel 2431  df-nfc 2560  df-rab 2706  df-v 2950  df-dif 3315  df-un 3317  df-in 3319  df-ss 3326  df-nul 3621  df-if 3732  df-sn 3812  df-pr 3813  df-op 3815  df-oprab 6077
  Copyright terms: Public domain W3C validator