HomeHome Metamath Proof Explorer < Previous   Next >
Related theorems
Unicode version

Definition df-sb 1816
Description: Define proper substitution. Remark 9.1 in [Megill] p. 447 (p. 15 of the preprint). For our notation, we use [y / x]ph to mean "the wff that results when y is properly substituted for x in the wff ph." We can also use [y / x]ph in place of the "free for" side condition used in traditional predicate calculus; see, for example, stdpc4 1829.

Our notation was introduced in Haskell B. Curry's Foundations of Mathematical Logic (1977), p. 316 and is frequently used in textbooks of lambda calculus and combinatory logic. This notation improves the common but ambiguous notation, "ph(y) is the wff that results when y is properly substituted for x in ph(x)." For example, if the original ph(x) is x = y, then ph(y) is y = y, from which we obtain that ph(x) is x = x. So what exactly does ph(x) mean? Curry's notation solves this problem.

In most books, proper substitution has a somewhat complicated recursive definition with multiple cases based on the occurrences of free and bound variables in the wff. Instead, we use a single formula that is exactly equivalent and gives us a direct definition. We later prove that our definition has the properties we expect of proper substitution (see theorems sbequ 1875, sbcom2 1990 and sbid2v 1998).

Note that our definition is valid even when x and y are replaced with the same variable, as sbid 1828 shows. We achieve this by having x free in the first conjunct and bound in the second. We can also achieve this by using a dummy variable, as the alternate definition dfsb7 1995 shows (which some logicians may prefer because it doesn't mix free and bound variables). Another version that mixes free and bound variables is dfsb3 1872. When x and y are distinct, we can express proper substitution with the simpler expressions of sb5 1915 and sb6 1914.

There are no restrictions on any of the variables, including what variables may occur in wff ph.

Assertion
Ref Expression
df-sb |- ([y / x]ph <-> ((x = y -> ph) /\ E.x(x = y /\ ph)))

Detailed syntax breakdown of Definition df-sb
StepHypRef Expression
1 wph . . 3 wff ph
2 vx . . 3 set x
3 vy . . . 4 set y
43cv 1585 . . 3 class y
51, 2, 4wsbc 1814 . 2 wff [y / x]ph
62cv 1585 . . . . 5 class x
76, 4wceq 1586 . . . 4 wff x = y
87, 1wi 3 . . 3 wff (x = y -> ph)
97, 1wa 337 . . . 4 wff (x = y /\ ph)
109, 2wex 1615 . . 3 wff E.x(x = y /\ ph)
118, 10wa 337 . 2 wff ((x = y -> ph) /\ E.x(x = y /\ ph))
125, 11wb 219 1 wff ([y / x]ph <-> ((x = y -> ph) /\ E.x(x = y /\ ph)))
Colors of variables: wff set class
This definition is referenced by:  sbimi 1817  drsb1 1819  sb1 1820  sb2 1821  sbequ1 1822  sbequ2 1823  sbn 1877  sb6 1914  subsym1 14951
Copyright terms: Public domain