Theorem dfsb7 1340

Description: An alternate definition of proper substitution df-sb 1172. By introducing a dummy variable z in the definiens, we are able to eliminate any distinct variable restrictions among the variables x, y, and ph of the definiendum. No distinct variable conflicts arise because z effectively insulates x from y. To achieve this, we use a chain of two substitutions in the form of sb5 1268, first z for x then y for z. Compare Definition 2.1'' of [Quine] p. 17, which is obtained from this theorem by applying df-clab 1464. Theorem sb7f 1341 provides a version where ph and z don't have to be distinct.

Assertion

Ref	Expression
dfsb7	|- ([y / x]ph <-> E.z(z = y /\ E.x(x = z /\ ph)))

Distinct variable groups:   x,z   y,z   ph,z

Proof of Theorem dfsb7

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		sb5 1268	. . 3 |- ([z / x]ph <-> E.x(x = z /\ ph))
2	1	sbbii 1174	. 2 |- ([y / z][z / x]ph <-> [y / z]E.x(x = z /\ ph))
3		ax-17 971	. . 3 |- (ph -> A.zph)
4	3	sbco2 1255	. 2 |- ([y / z][z / x]ph <-> [y / x]ph)
5		sb5 1268	. 2 |- ([y / z]E.x(x = z /\ ph) <-> E.z(z = y /\ E.x(x = z /\ ph)))
6	2, 4, 5	3bitr3 181	1 |- ([y / x]ph <-> E.z(z = y /\ E.x(x = z /\ ph)))

Syntax hints:   <-> wb 146   /\ wa 223   = wceq 956  E.wex 980  [wsbc 1170

This theorem is referenced by:  sb7f 1341

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-1 4  ax-2 5  ax-3 6  ax-mp 7  ax-7 962  ax-gen 963  ax-8 964  ax-9 965  ax-10 966  ax-11 967  ax-12 968  ax-17 971  ax-4 973  ax-5o 975  ax-6o 978  ax-9o 1123  ax-10o 1140  ax-16 1210  ax-11o 1218

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 147  df-or 224  df-an 225  df-ex 981  df-sb 1172

Copyright terms: Public domain