Description: This theorem, which is
similar to Theorem 6.7 of [Quine] p. 42,
provides
us a weak definition of the proper substitution of a class for a set
that we will use in place of df-sbc 1945 above. We derive all our results
from starting from here instead of df-sbc 1945. As a consequence we can
derive elabs 1969, which is a weaker version of df-sbc 1945 that leaves
substitution undefined when is a proper class. We thus leave
unspecified the "official" behavior for proper classes, which
could be
as in the sbc5 1959 assertion (always false) or as in sbc6 1960
(always true)
or some more meaningful possibility in the future, that some clever
person may discover, that is closer to Quine's definition. (Quine's
actual definition cannot be expressed directly in our formal
system.) |