MPE Home Metamath Proof Explorer < Previous   Next >
Nearby theorems
Mirrors  >  Home  >  MPE Home  >  Th. List  >  difrab Unicode version

Theorem difrab 3442
Description: Difference of two restricted class abstractions. (Contributed by NM, 23-Oct-2004.)
Assertion
Ref Expression
difrab  |-  ( { x  e.  A  |  ph }  \  { x  e.  A  |  ps } )  =  {
x  e.  A  | 
( ph  /\  -.  ps ) }

Proof of Theorem difrab
StepHypRef Expression
1 df-rab 2552 . . 3  |-  { x  e.  A  |  ph }  =  { x  |  ( x  e.  A  /\  ph ) }
2 df-rab 2552 . . 3  |-  { x  e.  A  |  ps }  =  { x  |  ( x  e.  A  /\  ps ) }
31, 2difeq12i 3292 . 2  |-  ( { x  e.  A  |  ph }  \  { x  e.  A  |  ps } )  =  ( { x  |  ( x  e.  A  /\  ph ) }  \  {
x  |  ( x  e.  A  /\  ps ) } )
4 df-rab 2552 . . 3  |-  { x  e.  A  |  ( ph  /\  -.  ps ) }  =  { x  |  ( x  e.  A  /\  ( ph  /\ 
-.  ps ) ) }
5 difab 3437 . . . 4  |-  ( { x  |  ( x  e.  A  /\  ph ) }  \  { x  |  ( x  e.  A  /\  ps ) } )  =  {
x  |  ( ( x  e.  A  /\  ph )  /\  -.  (
x  e.  A  /\  ps ) ) }
6 anass 630 . . . . . 6  |-  ( ( ( x  e.  A  /\  ph )  /\  -.  ps )  <->  ( x  e.  A  /\  ( ph  /\ 
-.  ps ) ) )
7 simpr 447 . . . . . . . . 9  |-  ( ( x  e.  A  /\  ps )  ->  ps )
87con3i 127 . . . . . . . 8  |-  ( -. 
ps  ->  -.  ( x  e.  A  /\  ps )
)
98anim2i 552 . . . . . . 7  |-  ( ( ( x  e.  A  /\  ph )  /\  -.  ps )  ->  ( ( x  e.  A  /\  ph )  /\  -.  (
x  e.  A  /\  ps ) ) )
10 pm3.2 434 . . . . . . . . . 10  |-  ( x  e.  A  ->  ( ps  ->  ( x  e.  A  /\  ps )
) )
1110adantr 451 . . . . . . . . 9  |-  ( ( x  e.  A  /\  ph )  ->  ( ps  ->  ( x  e.  A  /\  ps ) ) )
1211con3d 125 . . . . . . . 8  |-  ( ( x  e.  A  /\  ph )  ->  ( -.  ( x  e.  A  /\  ps )  ->  -.  ps ) )
1312imdistani 671 . . . . . . 7  |-  ( ( ( x  e.  A  /\  ph )  /\  -.  ( x  e.  A  /\  ps ) )  -> 
( ( x  e.  A  /\  ph )  /\  -.  ps ) )
149, 13impbii 180 . . . . . 6  |-  ( ( ( x  e.  A  /\  ph )  /\  -.  ps )  <->  ( ( x  e.  A  /\  ph )  /\  -.  ( x  e.  A  /\  ps ) ) )
156, 14bitr3i 242 . . . . 5  |-  ( ( x  e.  A  /\  ( ph  /\  -.  ps ) )  <->  ( (
x  e.  A  /\  ph )  /\  -.  (
x  e.  A  /\  ps ) ) )
1615abbii 2395 . . . 4  |-  { x  |  ( x  e.  A  /\  ( ph  /\ 
-.  ps ) ) }  =  { x  |  ( ( x  e.  A  /\  ph )  /\  -.  ( x  e.  A  /\  ps )
) }
175, 16eqtr4i 2306 . . 3  |-  ( { x  |  ( x  e.  A  /\  ph ) }  \  { x  |  ( x  e.  A  /\  ps ) } )  =  {
x  |  ( x  e.  A  /\  ( ph  /\  -.  ps )
) }
184, 17eqtr4i 2306 . 2  |-  { x  e.  A  |  ( ph  /\  -.  ps ) }  =  ( {
x  |  ( x  e.  A  /\  ph ) }  \  { x  |  ( x  e.  A  /\  ps ) } )
193, 18eqtr4i 2306 1  |-  ( { x  e.  A  |  ph }  \  { x  e.  A  |  ps } )  =  {
x  e.  A  | 
( ph  /\  -.  ps ) }
Colors of variables: wff set class
Syntax hints:   -. wn 3    -> wi 4    /\ wa 358    = wceq 1623    e. wcel 1684   {cab 2269   {crab 2547    \ cdif 3149
This theorem is referenced by:  alephsuc3  8202  shftmbl  18896  musum  20431
This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-1 5  ax-2 6  ax-3 7  ax-mp 8  ax-gen 1533  ax-5 1544  ax-17 1603  ax-9 1635  ax-8 1643  ax-6 1703  ax-7 1708  ax-11 1715  ax-12 1866  ax-ext 2264
This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 177  df-or 359  df-an 360  df-tru 1310  df-ex 1529  df-nf 1532  df-sb 1630  df-clab 2270  df-cleq 2276  df-clel 2279  df-nfc 2408  df-ral 2548  df-rab 2552  df-v 2790  df-dif 3155
  Copyright terms: Public domain W3C validator