MPE Home Metamath Proof Explorer < Previous   Next >
Nearby theorems
Mirrors  >  Home  >  MPE Home  >  Th. List  >  fzval2 Unicode version

Theorem fzval2 10801
Description: An alternative way of expressing a finite set of sequential integers. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 3-Nov-2013.)
Assertion
Ref Expression
fzval2  |-  ( ( M  e.  ZZ  /\  N  e.  ZZ )  ->  ( M ... N
)  =  ( ( M [,] N )  i^i  ZZ ) )

Proof of Theorem fzval2
Dummy variable  k is distinct from all other variables.
StepHypRef Expression
1 fzval 10800 . 2  |-  ( ( M  e.  ZZ  /\  N  e.  ZZ )  ->  ( M ... N
)  =  { k  e.  ZZ  |  ( M  <_  k  /\  k  <_  N ) } )
2 zssre 10047 . . . . . . 7  |-  ZZ  C_  RR
3 ressxr 8892 . . . . . . 7  |-  RR  C_  RR*
42, 3sstri 3201 . . . . . 6  |-  ZZ  C_  RR*
54sseli 3189 . . . . 5  |-  ( M  e.  ZZ  ->  M  e.  RR* )
64sseli 3189 . . . . 5  |-  ( N  e.  ZZ  ->  N  e.  RR* )
7 iccval 10711 . . . . 5  |-  ( ( M  e.  RR*  /\  N  e.  RR* )  ->  ( M [,] N )  =  { k  e.  RR*  |  ( M  <_  k  /\  k  <_  N ) } )
85, 6, 7syl2an 463 . . . 4  |-  ( ( M  e.  ZZ  /\  N  e.  ZZ )  ->  ( M [,] N
)  =  { k  e.  RR*  |  ( M  <_  k  /\  k  <_  N ) } )
98ineq1d 3382 . . 3  |-  ( ( M  e.  ZZ  /\  N  e.  ZZ )  ->  ( ( M [,] N )  i^i  ZZ )  =  ( {
k  e.  RR*  |  ( M  <_  k  /\  k  <_  N ) }  i^i  ZZ ) )
10 inrab2 3454 . . . 4  |-  ( { k  e.  RR*  |  ( M  <_  k  /\  k  <_  N ) }  i^i  ZZ )  =  { k  e.  (
RR*  i^i  ZZ )  |  ( M  <_ 
k  /\  k  <_  N ) }
11 sseqin2 3401 . . . . . 6  |-  ( ZZ  C_  RR*  <->  ( RR*  i^i  ZZ )  =  ZZ )
124, 11mpbi 199 . . . . 5  |-  ( RR*  i^i 
ZZ )  =  ZZ
13 rabeq 2795 . . . . 5  |-  ( (
RR*  i^i  ZZ )  =  ZZ  ->  { k  e.  ( RR*  i^i  ZZ )  |  ( M  <_  k  /\  k  <_  N ) }  =  { k  e.  ZZ  |  ( M  <_ 
k  /\  k  <_  N ) } )
1412, 13ax-mp 8 . . . 4  |-  { k  e.  ( RR*  i^i  ZZ )  |  ( M  <_  k  /\  k  <_  N ) }  =  { k  e.  ZZ  |  ( M  <_ 
k  /\  k  <_  N ) }
1510, 14eqtri 2316 . . 3  |-  ( { k  e.  RR*  |  ( M  <_  k  /\  k  <_  N ) }  i^i  ZZ )  =  { k  e.  ZZ  |  ( M  <_ 
k  /\  k  <_  N ) }
169, 15syl6req 2345 . 2  |-  ( ( M  e.  ZZ  /\  N  e.  ZZ )  ->  { k  e.  ZZ  |  ( M  <_ 
k  /\  k  <_  N ) }  =  ( ( M [,] N
)  i^i  ZZ )
)
171, 16eqtrd 2328 1  |-  ( ( M  e.  ZZ  /\  N  e.  ZZ )  ->  ( M ... N
)  =  ( ( M [,] N )  i^i  ZZ ) )
Colors of variables: wff set class
Syntax hints:    -> wi 4    /\ wa 358    = wceq 1632    e. wcel 1696   {crab 2560    i^i cin 3164    C_ wss 3165   class class class wbr 4039  (class class class)co 5874   RRcr 8752   RR*cxr 8882    <_ cle 8884   ZZcz 10040   [,]cicc 10675   ...cfz 10798
This theorem is referenced by:  dvfsumle  19384  dvfsumabs  19386  taylplem1  19758  taylplem2  19759  taylpfval  19760  dvtaylp  19765  ppisval  20357
This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-1 5  ax-2 6  ax-3 7  ax-mp 8  ax-gen 1536  ax-5 1547  ax-17 1606  ax-9 1644  ax-8 1661  ax-13 1698  ax-14 1700  ax-6 1715  ax-7 1720  ax-11 1727  ax-12 1878  ax-ext 2277  ax-sep 4157  ax-nul 4165  ax-pr 4230  ax-un 4528  ax-cnex 8809  ax-resscn 8810
This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 177  df-or 359  df-an 360  df-3or 935  df-3an 936  df-tru 1310  df-ex 1532  df-nf 1535  df-sb 1639  df-eu 2160  df-mo 2161  df-clab 2283  df-cleq 2289  df-clel 2292  df-nfc 2421  df-ne 2461  df-ral 2561  df-rex 2562  df-rab 2565  df-v 2803  df-sbc 3005  df-dif 3168  df-un 3170  df-in 3172  df-ss 3179  df-nul 3469  df-if 3579  df-sn 3659  df-pr 3660  df-op 3662  df-uni 3844  df-br 4040  df-opab 4094  df-id 4325  df-xp 4711  df-rel 4712  df-cnv 4713  df-co 4714  df-dm 4715  df-iota 5235  df-fun 5273  df-fv 5279  df-ov 5877  df-oprab 5878  df-mpt2 5879  df-xr 8887  df-neg 9056  df-z 10041  df-icc 10679  df-fz 10799
  Copyright terms: Public domain W3C validator