MPE Home Metamath Proof Explorer < Previous   Next >
Nearby theorems
Mirrors  >  Home  >  MPE Home  >  Th. List  >  iunopab Unicode version

Theorem iunopab 4312
Description: Move indexed union inside an ordered-pair abstraction. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 20-Feb-2015.)
Assertion
Ref Expression
iunopab  |-  U_ z  e.  A  { <. x ,  y >.  |  ph }  =  { <. x ,  y >.  |  E. z  e.  A  ph }
Distinct variable groups:    x, A    y, A    y, z    x, z
Allowed substitution hints:    ph( x, y, z)    A( z)

Proof of Theorem iunopab
Dummy variable  w is distinct from all other variables.
StepHypRef Expression
1 elopab 4288 . . . . 5  |-  ( w  e.  { <. x ,  y >.  |  ph } 
<->  E. x E. y
( w  =  <. x ,  y >.  /\  ph ) )
21rexbii 2581 . . . 4  |-  ( E. z  e.  A  w  e.  { <. x ,  y >.  |  ph } 
<->  E. z  e.  A  E. x E. y ( w  =  <. x ,  y >.  /\  ph ) )
3 rexcom4 2820 . . . . 5  |-  ( E. z  e.  A  E. x E. y ( w  =  <. x ,  y
>.  /\  ph )  <->  E. x E. z  e.  A  E. y ( w  = 
<. x ,  y >.  /\  ph ) )
4 rexcom4 2820 . . . . . . 7  |-  ( E. z  e.  A  E. y ( w  = 
<. x ,  y >.  /\  ph )  <->  E. y E. z  e.  A  ( w  =  <. x ,  y >.  /\  ph ) )
5 r19.42v 2707 . . . . . . . 8  |-  ( E. z  e.  A  ( w  =  <. x ,  y >.  /\  ph ) 
<->  ( w  =  <. x ,  y >.  /\  E. z  e.  A  ph )
)
65exbii 1572 . . . . . . 7  |-  ( E. y E. z  e.  A  ( w  = 
<. x ,  y >.  /\  ph )  <->  E. y
( w  =  <. x ,  y >.  /\  E. z  e.  A  ph )
)
74, 6bitri 240 . . . . . 6  |-  ( E. z  e.  A  E. y ( w  = 
<. x ,  y >.  /\  ph )  <->  E. y
( w  =  <. x ,  y >.  /\  E. z  e.  A  ph )
)
87exbii 1572 . . . . 5  |-  ( E. x E. z  e.  A  E. y ( w  =  <. x ,  y >.  /\  ph ) 
<->  E. x E. y
( w  =  <. x ,  y >.  /\  E. z  e.  A  ph )
)
93, 8bitri 240 . . . 4  |-  ( E. z  e.  A  E. x E. y ( w  =  <. x ,  y
>.  /\  ph )  <->  E. x E. y ( w  = 
<. x ,  y >.  /\  E. z  e.  A  ph ) )
102, 9bitri 240 . . 3  |-  ( E. z  e.  A  w  e.  { <. x ,  y >.  |  ph } 
<->  E. x E. y
( w  =  <. x ,  y >.  /\  E. z  e.  A  ph )
)
1110abbii 2408 . 2  |-  { w  |  E. z  e.  A  w  e.  { <. x ,  y >.  |  ph } }  =  {
w  |  E. x E. y ( w  = 
<. x ,  y >.  /\  E. z  e.  A  ph ) }
12 df-iun 3923 . 2  |-  U_ z  e.  A  { <. x ,  y >.  |  ph }  =  { w  |  E. z  e.  A  w  e.  { <. x ,  y >.  |  ph } }
13 df-opab 4094 . 2  |-  { <. x ,  y >.  |  E. z  e.  A  ph }  =  { w  |  E. x E. y ( w  =  <. x ,  y
>.  /\  E. z  e.  A  ph ) }
1411, 12, 133eqtr4i 2326 1  |-  U_ z  e.  A  { <. x ,  y >.  |  ph }  =  { <. x ,  y >.  |  E. z  e.  A  ph }
Colors of variables: wff set class
Syntax hints:    /\ wa 358   E.wex 1531    = wceq 1632    e. wcel 1696   {cab 2282   E.wrex 2557   <.cop 3656   U_ciun 3921   {copab 4092
This theorem is referenced by:  marypha2lem2  7205
This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-1 5  ax-2 6  ax-3 7  ax-mp 8  ax-gen 1536  ax-5 1547  ax-17 1606  ax-9 1644  ax-8 1661  ax-14 1700  ax-6 1715  ax-7 1720  ax-11 1727  ax-12 1878  ax-ext 2277  ax-sep 4157  ax-nul 4165  ax-pr 4230
This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 177  df-or 359  df-an 360  df-3an 936  df-tru 1310  df-ex 1532  df-nf 1535  df-sb 1639  df-clab 2283  df-cleq 2289  df-clel 2292  df-nfc 2421  df-ne 2461  df-rex 2562  df-v 2803  df-dif 3168  df-un 3170  df-in 3172  df-ss 3179  df-nul 3469  df-if 3579  df-sn 3659  df-pr 3660  df-op 3662  df-iun 3923  df-opab 4094
  Copyright terms: Public domain W3C validator