MPE Home Metamath Proof Explorer < Previous   Next >
Nearby theorems
Mirrors  >  Home  >  MPE Home  >  Th. List  >  iunopab Structured version   Unicode version

Theorem iunopab 4487
Description: Move indexed union inside an ordered-pair abstraction. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 20-Feb-2015.)
Assertion
Ref Expression
iunopab  |-  U_ z  e.  A  { <. x ,  y >.  |  ph }  =  { <. x ,  y >.  |  E. z  e.  A  ph }
Distinct variable groups:    x, A    y, A    y, z    x, z
Allowed substitution hints:    ph( x, y, z)    A( z)

Proof of Theorem iunopab
Dummy variable  w is distinct from all other variables.
StepHypRef Expression
1 elopab 4463 . . . . 5  |-  ( w  e.  { <. x ,  y >.  |  ph } 
<->  E. x E. y
( w  =  <. x ,  y >.  /\  ph ) )
21rexbii 2731 . . . 4  |-  ( E. z  e.  A  w  e.  { <. x ,  y >.  |  ph } 
<->  E. z  e.  A  E. x E. y ( w  =  <. x ,  y >.  /\  ph ) )
3 rexcom4 2976 . . . . 5  |-  ( E. z  e.  A  E. x E. y ( w  =  <. x ,  y
>.  /\  ph )  <->  E. x E. z  e.  A  E. y ( w  = 
<. x ,  y >.  /\  ph ) )
4 rexcom4 2976 . . . . . . 7  |-  ( E. z  e.  A  E. y ( w  = 
<. x ,  y >.  /\  ph )  <->  E. y E. z  e.  A  ( w  =  <. x ,  y >.  /\  ph ) )
5 r19.42v 2863 . . . . . . . 8  |-  ( E. z  e.  A  ( w  =  <. x ,  y >.  /\  ph ) 
<->  ( w  =  <. x ,  y >.  /\  E. z  e.  A  ph )
)
65exbii 1593 . . . . . . 7  |-  ( E. y E. z  e.  A  ( w  = 
<. x ,  y >.  /\  ph )  <->  E. y
( w  =  <. x ,  y >.  /\  E. z  e.  A  ph )
)
74, 6bitri 242 . . . . . 6  |-  ( E. z  e.  A  E. y ( w  = 
<. x ,  y >.  /\  ph )  <->  E. y
( w  =  <. x ,  y >.  /\  E. z  e.  A  ph )
)
87exbii 1593 . . . . 5  |-  ( E. x E. z  e.  A  E. y ( w  =  <. x ,  y >.  /\  ph ) 
<->  E. x E. y
( w  =  <. x ,  y >.  /\  E. z  e.  A  ph )
)
93, 8bitri 242 . . . 4  |-  ( E. z  e.  A  E. x E. y ( w  =  <. x ,  y
>.  /\  ph )  <->  E. x E. y ( w  = 
<. x ,  y >.  /\  E. z  e.  A  ph ) )
102, 9bitri 242 . . 3  |-  ( E. z  e.  A  w  e.  { <. x ,  y >.  |  ph } 
<->  E. x E. y
( w  =  <. x ,  y >.  /\  E. z  e.  A  ph )
)
1110abbii 2549 . 2  |-  { w  |  E. z  e.  A  w  e.  { <. x ,  y >.  |  ph } }  =  {
w  |  E. x E. y ( w  = 
<. x ,  y >.  /\  E. z  e.  A  ph ) }
12 df-iun 4096 . 2  |-  U_ z  e.  A  { <. x ,  y >.  |  ph }  =  { w  |  E. z  e.  A  w  e.  { <. x ,  y >.  |  ph } }
13 df-opab 4268 . 2  |-  { <. x ,  y >.  |  E. z  e.  A  ph }  =  { w  |  E. x E. y ( w  =  <. x ,  y
>.  /\  E. z  e.  A  ph ) }
1411, 12, 133eqtr4i 2467 1  |-  U_ z  e.  A  { <. x ,  y >.  |  ph }  =  { <. x ,  y >.  |  E. z  e.  A  ph }
Colors of variables: wff set class
Syntax hints:    /\ wa 360   E.wex 1551    = wceq 1653    e. wcel 1726   {cab 2423   E.wrex 2707   <.cop 3818   U_ciun 4094   {copab 4266
This theorem is referenced by:  marypha2lem2  7442
This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-1 5  ax-2 6  ax-3 7  ax-mp 8  ax-gen 1556  ax-5 1567  ax-17 1627  ax-9 1667  ax-8 1688  ax-14 1730  ax-6 1745  ax-7 1750  ax-11 1762  ax-12 1951  ax-ext 2418  ax-sep 4331  ax-nul 4339  ax-pr 4404
This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 179  df-or 361  df-an 362  df-3an 939  df-tru 1329  df-ex 1552  df-nf 1555  df-sb 1660  df-clab 2424  df-cleq 2430  df-clel 2433  df-nfc 2562  df-ne 2602  df-rex 2712  df-v 2959  df-dif 3324  df-un 3326  df-in 3328  df-ss 3335  df-nul 3630  df-if 3741  df-sn 3821  df-pr 3822  df-op 3824  df-iun 4096  df-opab 4268
  Copyright terms: Public domain W3C validator