mmtheorems14 - Metamath Proof Explorer

Jump to page: Contents + 1 1-100 2 101-200 3 201-300 4 301-400 5 401-500 6 501-600 7 601-700 8 701-800 9 801-900 10 901-1000 11 1001-1100 12 1101-1200 13 1201-1300 14 1301-1400 15 1401-1500 16 1501-1600 17 1601-1700 18 1701-1800 19 1801-1900 20 1901-2000 21 2001-2100 22 2101-2200 23 2201-2300 24 2301-2400 25 2401-2500 26 2501-2600 27 2601-2700 28 2701-2800 29 2801-2900 30 2901-3000 31 3001-3100 32 3101-3200 33 3201-3300 34 3301-3400 35 3401-3500 36 3501-3600 37 3601-3700 38 3701-3800 39 3801-3900 40 3901-4000 41 4001-4100 42 4101-4200 43 4201-4300 44 4301-4400 45 4401-4500 46 4501-4600 47 4601-4700 48 4701-4800 49 4801-4900 50 4901-5000 51 5001-5100 52 5101-5200 53 5201-5300 54 5301-5400 55 5401-5500 56 5501-5600 57 5601-5700 58 5701-5800 59 5801-5900 60 5901-6000 61 6001-6100 62 6101-6200 63 6201-6300 64 6301-6400 65 6401-6500 66 6501-6600 67 6601-6700 68 6701-6800 69 6801-6900 70 6901-7000 71 7001-7100 72 7101-7200 73 7201-7300 74 7301-7400 75 7401-7500 76 7501-7600 77 7601-7700 78 7701-7800 79 7801-7900 80 7901-8000 81 8001-8100 82 8101-8200 83 8201-8300 84 8301-8400 85 8401-8500 86 8501-8600 87 8601-8700 88 8701-8800 89 8801-8900 90 8901-9000 91 9001-9100 92 9101-9200 93 9201-9300 94 9301-9400 95 9401-9500 96 9501-9600 97 9601-9700 98 9701-9800 99 9801-9900 100 9901-10000 101 10001-10100 102 10101-10200 103 10201-10300 104 10301-10400 105 10401-10500 106 10501-10600 107 10601-10682

Statement List for Metamath Proof Explorer - 1301-1400 - Page 14 of 107

Type	Label	Description
Statement
Theorem	19.37v 1301	Special case of Theorem 19.37 of [Margaris] p. 90.
|- (E.x(ph -> ps) <-> (ph -> E.xps))
Theorem	19.37aiv 1302	Inference from Theorem 19.37 of [Margaris] p. 90.
|- E.x(ph -> ps)   =>   |- (ph -> E.xps)
Theorem	19.41v 1303	Special case of Theorem 19.41 of [Margaris] p. 90.
|- (E.x(ph /\ ps) <-> (E.xph /\ ps))
Theorem	19.41vv 1304	Theorem 19.41 of [Margaris] p. 90 with 2 quantifiers.
|- (E.xE.y(ph /\ ps) <-> (E.xE.yph /\ ps))
Theorem	19.41vvv 1305	Theorem 19.41 of [Margaris] p. 90 with 3 quantifiers.
|- (E.xE.yE.z(ph /\ ps) <-> (E.xE.yE.zph /\ ps))
Theorem	19.42v 1306	Special case of Theorem 19.42 of [Margaris] p. 90.
|- (E.x(ph /\ ps) <-> (ph /\ E.xps))
Theorem	exdistr 1307	Distribution of existential quantifiers.
|- (E.xE.y(ph /\ ps) <-> E.x(ph /\ E.yps))
Theorem	19.42vv 1308	Theorem 19.42 of [Margaris] p. 90 with 2 quantifiers.
|- (E.xE.y(ph /\ ps) <-> (ph /\ E.xE.yps))
Theorem	exdistr2 1309	Distribution of existential quantifiers.
|- (E.xE.yE.z(ph /\ ps) <-> E.x(ph /\ E.yE.zps))
Theorem	3exdistr 1310	Distribution of existential quantifiers.
|- (E.xE.yE.z(ph /\ ps /\ ch) <-> E.x(ph /\ E.y(ps /\ E.zch)))
Theorem	4exdistr 1311	Distribution of existential quantifiers.
|- (E.xE.yE.zE.w((ph /\ ps) /\ (ch /\ th)) <-> E.x(ph /\ E.y(ps /\ E.z(ch /\ E.wth))))
Theorem	cbvalv 1312	Rule used to change bound variables with implicit substitution.
|- (x = y -> (ph <-> ps))   =>   |- (A.xph <-> A.yps)
Theorem	cbvexv 1313	Rule used to change bound variables with implicit substitution.
|- (x = y -> (ph <-> ps))   =>   |- (E.xph <-> E.yps)
Theorem	cbval2 1314	Rule used to change bound variables with implicit substitution.
|- (ph -> A.zph)   &   |- (ph -> A.wph)   &   |- (ps -> A.xps)   &   |- (ps -> A.yps)   &   |- ((x = z /\ y = w) -> (ph <-> ps))   =>   |- (A.xA.yph <-> A.zA.wps)
Theorem	cbvex2 1315	Rule used to change bound variables with implicit substitution.
|- (ph -> A.zph)   &   |- (ph -> A.wph)   &   |- (ps -> A.xps)   &   |- (ps -> A.yps)   &   |- ((x = z /\ y = w) -> (ph <-> ps))   =>   |- (E.xE.yph <-> E.zE.wps)
Theorem	cbval2v 1316	Rule used to change bound variables with implicit substitution.
|- ((x = z /\ y = w) -> (ph <-> ps))   =>   |- (A.xA.yph <-> A.zA.wps)
Theorem	cbvex2v 1317	Rule used to change bound variables with implicit substitution.
|- ((x = z /\ y = w) -> (ph <-> ps))   =>   |- (E.xE.yph <-> E.zE.wps)
Theorem	cbvald 1318	Deduction used to change bound variables with implicit substitution, particularly useful in conjunction with dvelim 1350.
|- (ph -> A.yph)   &   |- (ph -> (ps -> A.yps))   &   |- (ph -> (x = y -> (ps <-> ch)))   =>   |- (ph -> (A.xps <-> A.ych))
Theorem	cbvexd 1319	Deduction used to change bound variables with implicit substitution, particularly useful in conjunction with dvelim 1350.
|- (ph -> A.yph)   &   |- (ph -> (ps -> A.yps))   &   |- (ph -> (x = y -> (ps <-> ch)))   =>   |- (ph -> (E.xps <-> E.ych))
Theorem	cbvex4v 1320	Rule used to change bound variables with implicit substitution.
|- ((x = v /\ y = u) -> (ph <-> ps))   &   |- ((z = f /\ w = g) -> (ps <-> ch))   =>   |- (E.xE.yE.zE.wph <-> E.vE.uE.fE.gch)
Theorem	eeanv 1321	Rearrange existential quantifiers.
|- (E.xE.y(ph /\ ps) <-> (E.xph /\ E.yps))
Theorem	eeeanv 1322	Rearrange existential quantifiers.
|- (E.xE.yE.z(ph /\ ps /\ ch) <-> (E.xph /\ E.yps /\ E.zch))
Theorem	ee4anv 1323	Rearrange existential quantifiers.
|- (E.xE.yE.zE.w(ph /\ ps) <-> (E.xE.yph /\ E.zE.wps))
Theorem	nexdv 1324	Deduction for generalization rule for negated wff.
|- (ph -> -. ps)   =>   |- (ph -> -. E.xps)
Theorem	chvarv 1325	Implicit substitution of y for x into a theorem.
|- (x = y -> (ph <-> ps))   &   |- ph   =>   |- ps
Theorem	cleljust 1326	When the class variables in definition df-clel 1470 are replaced with set variables, this theorem of predicate calculus is the result. This theorem provides part of the justification for the consistency of that definition, which "overloads" the set variables in wel 957 with the class variables in wcel 956.
|- (x e. y <-> E.z(z = x /\ z e. y))
More substitution theorems
Theorem	equsb3lem 1327	Lemma for equsb3 1328.
Theorem	equsb3 1328	Substitution applied to an atomic wff. (Contributed by Raph Levien and FL, 4-Dec-2005.)
|- ([x / y]y = z <-> x = z)
Theorem	elsb3 1329	Substitution applied to an atomic membership wff.
|- ([x / y]y e. z <-> x e. z)
Theorem	hbs1 1330	x is not free in [y / x]ph when x and y are distinct.
|- ([y / x]ph -> A.x[y / x]ph)
Theorem	hbsb 1331	If z is not free in ph, it is not free in [y / x]ph when y and z are distinct.
|- (ph -> A.zph)   =>   |- ([y / x]ph -> A.z[y / x]ph)
Theorem	sbcom2 1332	Commutativity law for substitution. Used in proof of Theorem 9.7 of [Megill] p. 449 (p. 16 of the preprint).
|- ([w / z][y / x]ph <-> [y / x][w / z]ph)
Theorem	2sb5 1333	Equivalence for double substitution.
|- ([z / x][w / y]ph <-> E.xE.y((x = z /\ y = w) /\ ph))
Theorem	2sb6 1334	Equivalence for double substitution.
|- ([z / x][w / y]ph <-> A.xA.y((x = z /\ y = w) -> ph))
Theorem	sb6a 1335	Equivalence for substitution.
|- ([y / x]ph <-> A.x(x = y -> [x / y]ph))
Theorem	2sb5rf 1336	Reversed double substitution.
|- (ph -> A.zph)   &   |- (ph -> A.wph)   =>   |- (ph <-> E.zE.w((z = x /\ w = y) /\ [z / x][w / y]ph))
Theorem	2sb6rf 1337	Reversed double substitution.
|- (ph -> A.zph)   &   |- (ph -> A.wph)   =>   |- (ph <-> A.zA.w((z = x /\ w = y) -> [z / x][w / y]ph))
Theorem	dfsb7 1338	An alternate definition of proper substitution df-sb 1170. By introducing a dummy variable z in the definiens, we are able to eliminate any distinct variable restrictions among the variables x, y, and ph of the definiendum. No distinct variable conflicts arise because z effectively insulates x from y. To achieve this, we use a chain of two substitutions in the form of sb5 1266, first z for x then y for z. Compare Definition 2.1'' of [Quine] p. 17, which is obtained from this theorem by applying df-clab 1462. Theorem sb7f 1339 provides a version where ph and z don't have to be distinct.
|- ([y / x]ph <-> E.z(z = y /\ E.x(x = z /\ ph)))
Theorem	sb7f 1339	This version of dfsb7 1338 does not require that ph and z be distinct. This permits it to be used as a definition for substitution in a formalization that omits the logically redundant axiom ax-17 969 i.e. that doesn't have the concept of a variable not occurring in a wff. (df-sb 1170 is also suitable, but its mixing of free and bound variables is distasteful to some logicians.)
|- (ph -> A.zph)   =>   |- ([y / x]ph <-> E.z(z = y /\ E.x(x = z /\ ph)))
Theorem	sb10f 1340	Hao Wang's identity axiom P6 in Irving Copi, Symbolic Logic (5th ed., 1979), p. 328. In traditional predicate calculus, this is a sole axiom for identity from which the usual ones can be derived.
|- (ph -> A.xph)   =>   |- ([y / z]ph <-> E.x(x = y /\ [x / z]ph))
Theorem	sbid2v 1341	An identity law for substitution. Used in proof of Theorem 9.7 of [Megill] p. 449 (p. 16 of the preprint).
|- ([y / x][x / y]ph <-> ph)
Theorem	sbelx 1342	Elimination of substitution.
|- (ph <-> E.x(x = y /\ [x / y]ph))
Theorem	sbel2x 1343	Elimination of double substitution.
|- (ph <-> E.xE.y((x = z /\ y = w) /\ [y / w][x / z]ph))
Theorem	sbal1 1344	A theorem used in elimination of disjoint variable restriction on x and y by replacing it with a distinctor -. A.xx = z.
|- (-. A.x x = z -> ([z / y]A.xph <-> A.x[z / y]ph))
Theorem	sbal 1345	Move universal quantifier in and out of substitution.
|- ([z / y]A.xph <-> A.x[z / y]ph)
Theorem	sbex 1346	Move existential quantifier in and out of substitution.
|- ([z / y]E.xph <-> E.x[z / y]ph)
Theorem	sbalv 1347	Quantify with new variable inside substitution.
|- ([y / x]ph <-> ps)   =>   |- ([y / x]A.zph <-> A.zps)
Theorem	exsb 1348	An equivalent expression for existence.
|- (E.xph <-> E.yA.x(x = y -> ph))
Theorem	2exsb 1349	An equivalent expression for double existence.
|- (E.xE.yph <-> E.zE.wA.xA.y((x = z /\ y = w) -> ph))
Theorem	dvelim 1350	This theorem can be used to eliminate a distinct variable restriction on x and z and replace it with the "distinctor" -. A.xx = y as an antecedent. ph normally has z free and can be read ph(z), and ps substitutes y for z and can be read ph(y). We don't require that x and y be distinct: if they aren't, the distinctor will become false (in multiple-element domains of discourse) and "protect" the consequent. To obtain a closed-theorem form of this inference, prefix the hypotheses with A.xA.z, conjoin them, and apply dvelimdf 1249.
|- (ph -> A.xph)   &   |- (z = y -> (ph <-> ps))   =>   |- (-. A.x x = y -> (ps -> A.xps))
Theorem	dvelimALT 1351	Version of dvelim 1350 that doesn't use ax-10 964. (See dvelimfALT 1151 for a version that doesn't use ax-11 965.)
|- (ph -> A.xph)   &   |- (z = y -> (ph <-> ps))   =>