HomeHome Metamath Proof Explorer < Previous   Next >
Related theorems
Unicode version

Theorem nalequcoms 1144
Description: A commutation rule for distinct variable specifiers.
Hypothesis
Ref Expression
nalequcoms.1 |- (-. A.x x = y -> ph)
Assertion
Ref Expression
nalequcoms |- (-. A.y y = x -> ph)

Proof of Theorem nalequcoms
StepHypRef Expression
1 alequcom 1142 . . 3 |- (A.x x = y -> A.y y = x)
2 nalequcoms.1 . . 3 |- (-. A.x x = y -> ph)
31, 2nsyl4 120 . 2 |- (-. ph -> A.y y = x)
43con1i 96 1 |- (-. A.y y = x -> ph)
Colors of variables: wff set class
Syntax hints:  -. wn 2   -> wi 3  A.wal 954   = wceq 956
This theorem is referenced by:  sbcom 1258  ax11inda2ALT 1369  ralcom2 1776  dfid3 2836  nd5 4942  axrepndlem1 4944  axrepndlem2 4945  axrepnd 4946  axpowndlem3 4951  axpownd 4953
This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-1 4  ax-2 5  ax-3 6  ax-mp 7  ax-10 966
Copyright terms: Public domain