| Metamath Proof Explorer |
< Previous
Next >
Related theorems Unicode version |
| Description: Deduction eliminating a conjunct. |
| Ref | Expression |
|---|---|
| pm3.26bda.1 |
|
| Ref | Expression |
|---|---|
| pm3.27bda |
|
| Step | Hyp | Ref | Expression |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | pm3.26bda.1 |
. . 3
| |
| 2 | 1 | biimpa 416 |
. 2
|
| 3 | 2 | pm3.27d 325 |
1
|
| Colors of variables: wff set class |
| Syntax hints: |
| This theorem is referenced by: elfzuz3t 6478 clmi1 7086 ivthlem1 7281 tgclt 7624 tgval3t 7625 cldopn 7672 cnpimaex 7765 cnima 7767 cnclima 7771 sspba 8386 sspg 8387 ssps 8389 sspn 8395 lnolin 8415 nmblore 8446 phpar 8483 ubthlem3 8531 ubthlem10 8538 ubthlem11 8539 ocorth 9164 vidfunid 10757 iddvvidd 10758 idcvvidc 10759 |
| This theorem was proved from axioms: ax-1 4 ax-2 5 ax-3 6 ax-mp 7 |
| This theorem depends on definitions: df-bi 147 df-an 225 |