MPE Home Metamath Proof Explorer < Previous   Next >
Nearby theorems
Mirrors  >  Home  >  MPE Home  >  Th. List  >  sb7f Structured version   Unicode version

Theorem sb7f 2198
Description: This version of dfsb7 2200 does not require that  ph and  z be distinct. This permits it to be used as a definition for substitution in a formalization that omits the logically redundant axiom ax-17 1627 i.e. that doesn't have the concept of a variable not occurring in a wff. (df-sb 1660 is also suitable, but its mixing of free and bound variables is distasteful to some logicians.) (Contributed by NM, 26-Jul-2006.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 6-Oct-2016.)
Hypothesis
Ref Expression
sb7f.1  |-  F/ z
ph
Assertion
Ref Expression
sb7f  |-  ( [ y  /  x ] ph 
<->  E. z ( z  =  y  /\  E. x ( x  =  z  /\  ph )
) )
Distinct variable group:    y, z
Allowed substitution hints:    ph( x, y, z)

Proof of Theorem sb7f
StepHypRef Expression
1 sb7f.1 . . . 4  |-  F/ z
ph
21sb5f 2125 . . 3  |-  ( [ z  /  x ] ph 
<->  E. x ( x  =  z  /\  ph ) )
32sbbii 1666 . 2  |-  ( [ y  /  z ] [ z  /  x ] ph  <->  [ y  /  z ] E. x ( x  =  z  /\  ph ) )
41sbco2 2163 . 2  |-  ( [ y  /  z ] [ z  /  x ] ph  <->  [ y  /  x ] ph )
5 sb5 2178 . 2  |-  ( [ y  /  z ] E. x ( x  =  z  /\  ph ) 
<->  E. z ( z  =  y  /\  E. x ( x  =  z  /\  ph )
) )
63, 4, 53bitr3i 268 1  |-  ( [ y  /  x ] ph 
<->  E. z ( z  =  y  /\  E. x ( x  =  z  /\  ph )
) )
Colors of variables: wff set class
Syntax hints:    <-> wb 178    /\ wa 360   E.wex 1551   F/wnf 1554    = wceq 1653   [wsb 1659
This theorem is referenced by:  sb7h  2199  dfsb7  2200
This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-1 5  ax-2 6  ax-3 7  ax-mp 8  ax-gen 1556  ax-5 1567  ax-17 1627  ax-9 1667  ax-8 1688  ax-6 1745  ax-7 1750  ax-11 1762  ax-12 1951
This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 179  df-or 361  df-an 362  df-tru 1329  df-ex 1552  df-nf 1555  df-sb 1660
  Copyright terms: Public domain W3C validator