Users' Mathboxes Mathbox for Alan Sare < Previous   Next >
Nearby theorems
Mirrors  >  Home  >  MPE Home  >  Th. List  >   Mathboxes  >  sucidALTVD Unicode version

Theorem sucidALTVD 28646
Description: A set belongs to its successor. Alternate proof of sucid 4471. The following User's Proof is a Virtual Deduction proof completed automatically by the tools program completeusersproof.cmd, which invokes Mel O'Cat's mmj2 and Norm Megill's Metamath Proof Assistant. sucidALT 28647 is sucidALTVD 28646 without virtual deductions and was automatically derived from sucidALTVD 28646. This proof illustrates that completeusersproof.cmd will generate a Metamath proof from any User's Proof which is "conventional" in the sense that no step is a virtual deduction, provided that all necessary unification theorems and transformation deductions are in set.mm. completeusersproof.cmd automatically converts such a conventional proof into a Virtual Deduction proof for which each step happens to be a 0-virtual hypothesis virtual deduction. The user does not need to search for reference theorem labels or deduction labels nor does he(she) need to use theorems and deductions which unify with reference theorems and deductions in set.mm. All that is necessary is that each theorem or deduction of the User's Proof unifies with some reference theorem or deduction in set.mm or is a semantic variation of some theorem or deduction which unifies with some reference theorem or deduction in set.mm. The definition of "semantic variation" has not been precisely defined. If it is obvious that a theorem or deduction has the same meaning as another theorem or deduction, then it is a semantic variation of the latter theorem or deduction. For example, step 4 of the User's Proof is a semantic variation of the definition (axiom)  suc  A  =  ( A  u.  { A } ), which unifies with df-suc 4398, a reference definition (axiom) in set.mm. Also, a theorem or deduction is said to be a semantic variation of a another theorem or deduction if it is obvious upon cursory inspection that it has the same meaning as a weaker form of the latter theorem or deduction. For example, the deduction  Ord  A infers  A. x  e.  A A. y  e.  A ( x  e.  y  \/  x  =  y  \/  y  e.  x ) is a semantic variation of the theorem  ( Ord  A  <->  ( Tr  A  /\  A. x  e.  A  A. y  e.  A ( x  e.  y  \/  x  =  y  \/  y  e.  x ) ) ), which unifies with the set.mm reference definition (axiom) dford2 7321.
h1::  |-  A  e.  _V
2:1:  |-  A  e.  { A }
3:2:  |-  A  e.  ( { A }  u.  A )
4::  |-  suc  A  =  ( { A }  u.  A )
qed:3,4:  |-  A  e.  suc  A
(Contributed by Alan Sare, 18-Feb-2012.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)
Hypothesis
Ref Expression
sucidALTVD.1  |-  A  e. 
_V
Assertion
Ref Expression
sucidALTVD  |-  A  e. 
suc  A

Proof of Theorem sucidALTVD
StepHypRef Expression
1 sucidALTVD.1 . . . 4  |-  A  e. 
_V
21snid 3667 . . 3  |-  A  e. 
{ A }
3 elun1 3342 . . 3  |-  ( A  e.  { A }  ->  A  e.  ( { A }  u.  A
) )
42, 3e0_ 28547 . 2  |-  A  e.  ( { A }  u.  A )
5 df-suc 4398 . . 3  |-  suc  A  =  ( A  u.  { A } )
65equncomi 3321 . 2  |-  suc  A  =  ( { A }  u.  A )
74, 6eleqtrri 2356 1  |-  A  e. 
suc  A
Colors of variables: wff set class
Syntax hints:    e. wcel 1684   _Vcvv 2788    u. cun 3150   {csn 3640   suc csuc 4394
This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-1 5  ax-2 6  ax-3 7  ax-mp 8  ax-gen 1533  ax-5 1544  ax-17 1603  ax-9 1635  ax-8 1643  ax-6 1703  ax-7 1708  ax-11 1715  ax-12 1866  ax-ext 2264
This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 177  df-or 359  df-an 360  df-tru 1310  df-ex 1529  df-nf 1532  df-sb 1630  df-clab 2270  df-cleq 2276  df-clel 2279  df-nfc 2408  df-v 2790  df-un 3157  df-in 3159  df-ss 3166  df-sn 3646  df-suc 4398
  Copyright terms: Public domain W3C validator