Users' Mathboxes Mathbox for Alan Sare < Previous   Next >
Nearby theorems
Mirrors  >  Home  >  MPE Home  >  Th. List  >   Mathboxes  >  tpid3gVD Unicode version

Theorem tpid3gVD 28380
Description: Virtual deduction proof of tpid3g 3817. (Contributed by Alan Sare, 24-Oct-2011.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)
Assertion
Ref Expression
tpid3gVD  |-  ( A  e.  B  ->  A  e.  { C ,  D ,  A } )

Proof of Theorem tpid3gVD
Dummy variable  x is distinct from all other variables.
StepHypRef Expression
1 idn2 28136 . . . . . . 7  |-  (. A  e.  B ,. x  =  A  ->.  x  =  A ).
2 3mix3 1126 . . . . . . . . . 10  |-  ( x  =  A  ->  (
x  =  C  \/  x  =  D  \/  x  =  A )
)
31, 2e2 28154 . . . . . . . . 9  |-  (. A  e.  B ,. x  =  A  ->.  ( x  =  C  \/  x  =  D  \/  x  =  A ) ).
4 abid 2346 . . . . . . . . 9  |-  ( x  e.  { x  |  ( x  =  C  \/  x  =  D  \/  x  =  A ) }  <->  ( x  =  C  \/  x  =  D  \/  x  =  A ) )
53, 4e2bir 28156 . . . . . . . 8  |-  (. A  e.  B ,. x  =  A  ->.  x  e.  {
x  |  ( x  =  C  \/  x  =  D  \/  x  =  A ) } ).
6 dftp2 3755 . . . . . . . . 9  |-  { C ,  D ,  A }  =  { x  |  ( x  =  C  \/  x  =  D  \/  x  =  A ) }
76eleq2i 2422 . . . . . . . 8  |-  ( x  e.  { C ,  D ,  A }  <->  x  e.  { x  |  ( x  =  C  \/  x  =  D  \/  x  =  A ) } )
85, 7e2bir 28156 . . . . . . 7  |-  (. A  e.  B ,. x  =  A  ->.  x  e.  { C ,  D ,  A } ).
9 eleq1 2418 . . . . . . . 8  |-  ( x  =  A  ->  (
x  e.  { C ,  D ,  A }  <->  A  e.  { C ,  D ,  A }
) )
109biimpd 198 . . . . . . 7  |-  ( x  =  A  ->  (
x  e.  { C ,  D ,  A }  ->  A  e.  { C ,  D ,  A }
) )
111, 8, 10e22 28194 . . . . . 6  |-  (. A  e.  B ,. x  =  A  ->.  A  e.  { C ,  D ,  A } ).
1211in2 28128 . . . . 5  |-  (. A  e.  B  ->.  ( x  =  A  ->  A  e.  { C ,  D ,  A } ) ).
1312gen11 28139 . . . 4  |-  (. A  e.  B  ->.  A. x ( x  =  A  ->  A  e.  { C ,  D ,  A } ) ).
14 19.23v 1896 . . . 4  |-  ( A. x ( x  =  A  ->  A  e.  { C ,  D ,  A } )  <->  ( E. x  x  =  A  ->  A  e.  { C ,  D ,  A }
) )
1513, 14e1bi 28152 . . 3  |-  (. A  e.  B  ->.  ( E. x  x  =  A  ->  A  e.  { C ,  D ,  A }
) ).
16 idn1 28087 . . . 4  |-  (. A  e.  B  ->.  A  e.  B ).
17 elisset 2874 . . . 4  |-  ( A  e.  B  ->  E. x  x  =  A )
1816, 17e1_ 28150 . . 3  |-  (. A  e.  B  ->.  E. x  x  =  A ).
19 id 19 . . 3  |-  ( ( E. x  x  =  A  ->  A  e.  { C ,  D ,  A } )  ->  ( E. x  x  =  A  ->  A  e.  { C ,  D ,  A } ) )
2015, 18, 19e11 28211 . 2  |-  (. A  e.  B  ->.  A  e.  { C ,  D ,  A } ).
2120in1 28084 1  |-  ( A  e.  B  ->  A  e.  { C ,  D ,  A } )
Colors of variables: wff set class
Syntax hints:    -> wi 4    \/ w3o 933   A.wal 1540   E.wex 1541    = wceq 1642    e. wcel 1710   {cab 2344   {ctp 3718
This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-1 5  ax-2 6  ax-3 7  ax-mp 8  ax-gen 1546  ax-5 1557  ax-17 1616  ax-9 1654  ax-8 1675  ax-6 1729  ax-7 1734  ax-11 1746  ax-12 1930  ax-ext 2339
This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 177  df-or 359  df-an 360  df-3or 935  df-tru 1319  df-ex 1542  df-nf 1545  df-sb 1649  df-clab 2345  df-cleq 2351  df-clel 2354  df-nfc 2483  df-v 2866  df-un 3233  df-sn 3722  df-pr 3723  df-tp 3724  df-vd1 28083  df-vd2 28092
  Copyright terms: Public domain W3C validator