| Metamath Proof Explorer |
< Previous
Next >
Related theorems GIF version |
| Description: Inference adding 2 restricted existential quantifiers to both sides of an equivalence. |
| Ref | Expression |
|---|---|
| 2rexbiia.1 | ⊢ ((x ∈ A ⋀ y ∈ B) → (φ ↔ ψ)) |
| Ref | Expression |
|---|---|
| 2rexbiia | ⊢ (∃x ∈ A ∃y ∈ B φ ↔ ∃x ∈ A ∃y ∈ B ψ) |
| Step | Hyp | Ref | Expression |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2rexbiia.1 | . . 3 ⊢ ((x ∈ A ⋀ y ∈ B) → (φ ↔ ψ)) | |
| 2 | 1 | rexbidva 1663 | . 2 ⊢ (x ∈ A → (∃y ∈ B φ ↔ ∃y ∈ B ψ)) |
| 3 | 2 | rexbiia 1677 | 1 ⊢ (∃x ∈ A ∃y ∈ B φ ↔ ∃x ∈ A ∃y ∈ B ψ) |
| Colors of variables: wff set class |
| Syntax hints: → wi 3 ↔ wb 146 ⋀ wa 223 ∈ wcel 960 ∃wrex 1649 |
| This theorem is referenced by: sqr2irr 6730 mdsymlem8 10332 |
| This theorem was proved from axioms: ax-1 4 ax-2 5 ax-3 6 ax-mp 7 ax-gen 965 ax-17 973 ax-4 975 ax-5o 977 |
| This theorem depends on definitions: df-bi 147 df-an 225 df-ex 983 df-rex 1653 |