| Metamath Proof Explorer |
< Previous
Next >
Related theorems GIF version |
| Description: Deduction adding a conjunct to antecedent. |
| Ref | Expression |
|---|---|
| 3adantr.1 | ⊢ ((φ ⋀ (ψ ⋀ χ)) → θ) |
| Ref | Expression |
|---|---|
| 3adantr1 | ⊢ ((φ ⋀ (τ ⋀ ψ ⋀ χ)) → θ) |
| Step | Hyp | Ref | Expression |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 3adantr.1 | . . . 4 ⊢ ((φ ⋀ (ψ ⋀ χ)) → θ) | |
| 2 | 1 | ancoms 438 | . . 3 ⊢ (((ψ ⋀ χ) ⋀ φ) → θ) |
| 3 | 2 | 3adantl1 805 | . 2 ⊢ (((τ ⋀ ψ ⋀ χ) ⋀ φ) → θ) |
| 4 | 3 | ancoms 438 | 1 ⊢ ((φ ⋀ (τ ⋀ ψ ⋀ χ)) → θ) |
| Colors of variables: wff set class |
| Syntax hints: → wi 3 ⋀ wa 223 ⋀ w3a 777 |
| This theorem is referenced by: 3ad2antr3 816 3adant3r1 844 dnsconst 7785 vcsubdir 8171 ipsubdir 8504 |
| This theorem was proved from axioms: ax-1 4 ax-2 5 ax-3 6 ax-mp 7 |
| This theorem depends on definitions: df-bi 147 df-an 225 df-3an 779 |