| Metamath Proof Explorer |
< Previous
Next >
Related theorems GIF version |
| Description: The existence of omega
(the class of natural numbers). Axiom 7 of
[TakeutiZaring] p. 43. This
theorem is proved assuming the Axiom of
Infinity and in fact is equivalent to it, as shown by the reverse
derivation inf0 4593.
A finitist (someone who doesn't believe in infinity) could, without contradiction, replace the Axiom of Infinity by its denial ¬ ω ∈ V; this would lead to ω = On (the proper class of ordinals) by omon 3140 and onprc 2986. The finitist could still develop natural number, integer, and rational number arithmetic but would be denied the real numbers (as well as much of the rest of mathematics). In deference to the finitist, much of our development is done, when possible, without invoking the Axiom of Infinity; an example is Peano's axioms peano1 3146 through peano5 3150 (which many textbooks prove more easily assuming Infinity). |
| Ref | Expression |
|---|---|
| omex | ⊢ ω ∈ V |
| Step | Hyp | Ref | Expression |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | zfinf 4613 | . . 3 ⊢ ∃x(∅ ∈ x ⋀ ∀y ∈ x suc y ∈ x) | |
| 2 | peano5 3150 | . . . . 5 ⊢ ((∅ ∈ x ⋀ ∀y ∈ ω (y ∈ x → suc y ∈ x)) → ω ⊆ x) | |
| 3 | ax-1 4 | . . . . . 6 ⊢ ((y ∈ x → suc y ∈ x) → (y ∈ ω → (y ∈ x → suc y ∈ x))) | |
| 4 | 3 | r19.20i2 1702 | . . . . 5 ⊢ (∀y ∈ x suc y ∈ x → ∀y ∈ ω (y ∈ x → suc y ∈ x)) |
| 5 | 2, 4 | sylan2 451 | . . . 4 ⊢ ((∅ ∈ x ⋀ ∀y ∈ x suc y ∈ x) → ω ⊆ x) |
| 6 | 5 | 19.22i 1039 | . . 3 ⊢ (∃x(∅ ∈ x ⋀ ∀y ∈ x suc y ∈ x) → ∃xω ⊆ x) |
| 7 | 1, 6 | ax-mp 7 | . 2 ⊢ ∃xω ⊆ x |
| 8 | visset 1811 | . . . 4 ⊢ x ∈ V | |
| 9 | 8 | ssex 2716 | . . 3 ⊢ (ω ⊆ x → ω ∈ V) |
| 10 | 9 | 19.23aiv 1295 | . 2 ⊢ (∃xω ⊆ x → ω ∈ V) |
| 11 | 7, 10 | ax-mp 7 | 1 ⊢ ω ∈ V |
| Colors of variables: wff set class |
| Syntax hints: → wi 3 ⋀ wa 223 ∈ wcel 957 ∃wex 979 ∀wral 1644 Vcvv 1809 ⊆ wss 2045 ∅c0 2278 suc csuc 2947 ωcom 3128 |
| This theorem is referenced by: inf5 4615 omelon 4616 dfom3 4617 elom3 4618 oancom 4620 isfinite 4621 nnsdom 4622 omenps 4623 omensuc 4624 unbnnt 4626 noinfep 4627 tz9.1 4633 sucdom 4829 aleph0 4850 alephprc 4880 alephfplem4 4886 alephval2 4889 dominf 4891 cfom 4903 cdainf 4924 niex 4996 nnenom 7476 xpomen 7478 unben 7484 aleph1re 7530 infxpidmlem10 7540 infdif 7547 iunctb 7554 aleph1irr 7557 |
| This theorem was proved from axioms: ax-1 4 ax-2 5 ax-3 6 ax-mp 7 ax-7 961 ax-gen 962 ax-8 963 ax-10 965 ax-11 966 ax-12 967 ax-13 968 ax-14 969 ax-17 970 ax-4 972 ax-5o 974 ax-6o 977 ax-9o 1122 ax-10o 1139 ax-16 1210 ax-11o 1218 ax-ext 1459 ax-sep 2700 ax-nul 2707 ax-pow 2739 ax-pr 2776 ax-un 2863 ax-inf2 4612 |
| This theorem depends on definitions: df-bi 147 df-or 224 df-an 225 df-3or 775 df-3an 776 df-ex 980 df-sb 1172 df-eu 1382 df-mo 1383 df-clab 1464 df-cleq 1469 df-clel 1472 df-ne 1586 df-ral 1648 df-rex 1649 df-v 1810 df-dif 2047 df-un 2048 df-in 2049 df-ss 2051 df-nul 2279 df-if 2360 df-pw 2400 df-sn 2410 df-pr 2411 df-tp 2413 df-op 2414 df-uni 2501 df-br 2617 df-opab 2664 df-tr 2678 df-eprel 2829 df-po 2837 df-so 2847 df-fr 2914 df-we 2931 df-ord 2948 df-on 2949 df-lim 2950 df-suc 2951 df-om 3129 |