| Metamath Proof Explorer |
< Previous
Next >
Related theorems GIF version |
| Description: Restricted existential specialization, using implicit substitition. |
| Ref | Expression |
|---|---|
| rcla4.1 | ⊢ (ψ → ∀xψ) |
| rcla4.2 | ⊢ (x = A → (φ ↔ ψ)) |
| Ref | Expression |
|---|---|
| rcla4e | ⊢ ((A ∈ B ⋀ ψ) → ∃x ∈ B φ) |
| Step | Hyp | Ref | Expression |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | ax-17 1012 | . . . 4 ⊢ (y ∈ A → ∀x y ∈ A) | |
| 2 | ax-17 1012 | . . . . 5 ⊢ (A ∈ B → ∀x A ∈ B) | |
| 3 | rcla4.1 | . . . . 5 ⊢ (ψ → ∀xψ) | |
| 4 | 2, 3 | hban 1050 | . . . 4 ⊢ ((A ∈ B ⋀ ψ) → ∀x(A ∈ B ⋀ ψ)) |
| 5 | eleq1 1581 | . . . . 5 ⊢ (x = A → (x ∈ B ↔ A ∈ B)) | |
| 6 | rcla4.2 | . . . . 5 ⊢ (x = A → (φ ↔ ψ)) | |
| 7 | 5, 6 | anbi12d 639 | . . . 4 ⊢ (x = A → ((x ∈ B ⋀ φ) ↔ (A ∈ B ⋀ ψ))) |
| 8 | 1, 4, 7 | cla4egf 1908 | . . 3 ⊢ (A ∈ B → ((A ∈ B ⋀ ψ) → ∃x(x ∈ B ⋀ φ))) |
| 9 | 8 | anabsi5 506 | . 2 ⊢ ((A ∈ B ⋀ ψ) → ∃x(x ∈ B ⋀ φ)) |
| 10 | df-rex 1697 | . 2 ⊢ (∃x ∈ B φ ↔ ∃x(x ∈ B ⋀ φ)) | |
| 11 | 9, 10 | sylibr 207 | 1 ⊢ ((A ∈ B ⋀ ψ) → ∃x ∈ B φ) |
| Colors of variables: wff set class |
| Syntax hints: → wi 3 ↔ wb 153 ⋀ wa 230 ∀wal 995 = wceq 997 ∈ wcel 999 ∃wex 1021 ∃wrex 1693 |
| This theorem is referenced by: rcla4ev 1924 infcvgaux1i 7309 fgsb 10663 fgsb2 10668 |
| This theorem was proved from axioms: ax-1 4 ax-2 5 ax-3 6 ax-mp 7 ax-7 1003 ax-gen 1004 ax-8 1005 ax-12 1009 ax-17 1012 ax-4 1014 ax-5o 1016 ax-6o 1019 ax-9o 1164 ax-ext 1504 |
| This theorem depends on definitions: df-bi 154 df-an 232 df-ex 1022 df-sb 1214 df-clab 1510 df-cleq 1515 df-clel 1518 df-rex 1697 df-v 1859 |