| Metamath Proof Explorer |
< Previous
Next >
Related theorems GIF version |
| Description: Inference of operation class abstraction subclass from implication. |
| Ref | Expression |
|---|---|
| ssoprab2i.1 | ⊢ (φ → ψ) |
| Ref | Expression |
|---|---|
| ssoprab2i | ⊢ {〈〈x, y〉, z〉∣φ} ⊆ {〈〈x, y〉, z〉∣ψ} |
| Step | Hyp | Ref | Expression |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | ssoprab2i.1 | . . . . 5 ⊢ (φ → ψ) | |
| 2 | 1 | anim2i 335 | . . . 4 ⊢ ((w = 〈x, y〉 ⋀ φ) → (w = 〈x, y〉 ⋀ ψ)) |
| 3 | 2 | 19.22i2 1043 | . . 3 ⊢ (∃x∃y(w = 〈x, y〉 ⋀ φ) → ∃x∃y(w = 〈x, y〉 ⋀ ψ)) |
| 4 | 3 | ssopab2i 2829 | . 2 ⊢ {〈w, z〉∣∃x∃y(w = 〈x, y〉 ⋀ φ)} ⊆ {〈w, z〉∣∃x∃y(w = 〈x, y〉 ⋀ ψ)} |
| 5 | dfoprab2 3997 | . 2 ⊢ {〈〈x, y〉, z〉∣φ} = {〈w, z〉∣∃x∃y(w = 〈x, y〉 ⋀ φ)} | |
| 6 | dfoprab2 3997 | . 2 ⊢ {〈〈x, y〉, z〉∣ψ} = {〈w, z〉∣∃x∃y(w = 〈x, y〉 ⋀ ψ)} | |
| 7 | 4, 5, 6 | 3sstr4 2103 | 1 ⊢ {〈〈x, y〉, z〉∣φ} ⊆ {〈〈x, y〉, z〉∣ψ} |
| Colors of variables: wff set class |
| Syntax hints: → wi 3 ⋀ wa 223 = wceq 958 ∃wex 982 ⊆ wss 2050 〈cop 2415 {copab 2671 {copab2 3970 |
| This theorem is referenced by: blfval 7832 nvvcop 8209 |
| This theorem was proved from axioms: ax-1 4 ax-2 5 ax-3 6 ax-mp 7 ax-7 964 ax-gen 965 ax-8 966 ax-10 968 ax-11 969 ax-12 970 ax-13 971 ax-14 972 ax-17 973 ax-4 975 ax-5o 977 ax-6o 980 ax-9o 1125 ax-10o 1142 ax-16 1212 ax-11o 1220 ax-ext 1462 ax-sep 2708 ax-pow 2748 ax-pr 2785 |
| This theorem depends on definitions: df-bi 147 df-or 224 df-an 225 df-ex 983 df-sb 1174 df-eu 1384 df-mo 1385 df-clab 1467 df-cleq 1472 df-clel 1475 df-ne 1590 df-v 1815 df-dif 2052 df-un 2053 df-in 2054 df-ss 2056 df-nul 2284 df-pw 2406 df-sn 2416 df-pr 2417 df-op 2420 df-opab 2672 df-oprab 3972 |